Medically reviewed by Dr Sin Yong · Last reviewed · 12 min read · Assessed personally by Dr Sin Yong · Jump to questions
“Acne scars” is a category, not a diagnosis. The classification physicians use — icepick, boxcar, rolling, plus raised hypertrophic scars — exists because each shape reflects a different injury below the surface and answers to a different tool. Most scarred faces carry a mixture, which is why one-device treatment plans disappoint.
WhatsApp Dr Sin Yong →Rolling acne scar treatment depends on scar type: icepick, boxcar and rolling scars each reflect a different injury below the surface. Rolling scars are broad undulations tethered by fibrous bands, so they are released rather than resurfaced. Most faces carry a mixture, which is why mapping the scars comes before choosing any device.
Also called: pitted scars, pockmarks, 痘疤, 痘坑, ニキビ跡

Not sure which scar type you have? Try the four-question checker →
The classification literature — from Jacob's original system to its modern updates — is built on one clinical fact: scar morphology encodes the injury beneath [1,2]. An icepick scar is a deep epithelial tract punched by a ruptured follicle; a boxcar is a block of lost dermis with intact edges; a rolling scar is skin of near-normal quality yanked downward by fibrous tethers to deeper tissue. Same disease, three different structural problems — and a treatment brilliant for one is irrelevant for another. Resurface an icepick and you polish the rim of a well. Subcise a boxcar and nothing changes, because nothing was tethered.
“If someone offers you one treatment for your acne scars, they haven't looked closely enough.”
Dr Sin YongOn mixed acne scars · from his Instagram explainer series

The evidence-based management literature maps the toolkit [2,3]: icepick scars respond to focal chemical reconstruction (TCA CROSS) and punch techniques; boxcars to fractional ablative resurfacing; rolling scars to subcision that releases the tethers, often with fillers or biostimulation supporting the released skin; hypertrophic and keloid scars — a different biology entirely — to the injection-based pathway on the keloid page. Energy-based collagen remodelling — fractional CO2, RF microneedling — runs across types as the field-improvement layer. This is why Dr Sin Yong's Tetra Pro SCAR3 programme and 4D scar reconstruction begin with a mapped scar census, not a device booking — the plan is a sequence assembled per face. Flat dark marks are a different problem: see PIH.
First: control the acne before reconstructing its damage — active disease keeps manufacturing new scars behind every repair, so the acne programme comes first when lesions are still appearing. Second: expect a campaign, not an event. The literature is consistent that meaningful atrophic scar revision is staged — collagen remodelling matures over months between sessions — and that improvement, not erasure, is the honest endpoint [2,3]. Anyone promising scar removal in one session is describing neither the evidence nor the biology.
Scar creams and oils on established atrophic scars — a structural deficit does not refill from the surface. Aggressive scrubbing or home dermarollers — uncontrolled micro-injury on scar-prone skin risks new damage, including PIH in Asian skin. One-device-fixes-all packages — a face carrying icepick, boxcar and rolling scars needs a sequenced mix, and a clinic that offers only one modality will treat every scar as if it were the type their machine handles. And waiting for scars to fade — atrophic scars persist without intervention; time softens edges, not deficits.
“A treatment brilliant for one scar type is irrelevant for another — resurfacing an icepick scar just gives the well a polished rim.”
— Dr Sin Yong
| Type / look-alike | How to recognise it | What it needs | What does not work |
|---|---|---|---|
| Icepick scar (narrow pitted type) | Narrow, deep, pit-like mark that barely changes when skin is stretched | Focal chemical reconstruction or punch techniques, decided on examination | Surface resurfacing alone, which only polishes the rim |
| Boxcar scar (wider flat-based type) | Wider depression with sharp walls and a flat base | Fractional ablative resurfacing, planned for pigment-prone skin | Creams and subcision, since nothing is tethered |
| Rolling scar (broad wave-like type) | Broad, wave-like undulation that flattens when the skin is stretched | Subcision to release tethers, sometimes with filler or biostimulation | Resurfacing alone, because the tether keeps pulling the skin down |
| Raised hypertrophic or keloid scar (look-alike) | Firm, raised scar that rises above the surrounding skin | An injection-based pathway assessed separately | Treating it as an atrophic scar with resurfacing |
| Flat dark mark (post-inflammatory pigment, look-alike) | Flat brown or red mark with no depression in the skin | Assessment of pigment type, sun protection and pigment-directed care | Scar procedures aimed at depressions |
Icepick, boxcar and rolling scars reflect different injuries, so a treatment suited to one can be irrelevant to another.
Atrophic scars persist without intervention; time softens edges but does not refill the structural deficit.
Stretch test and light: pull the skin taut — rolling scars flatten, boxcars soften slightly, icepicks barely change. Overhead light exaggerates rolling scars. A clinical mapping confirms and counts them.
No modality erases scars to unmarked skin — the honest, evidence-based endpoint is substantial, staged improvement. Distrust the word 'removal' in scar marketing.
A needle-based release of the fibrous bands tethering rolling scars — freeing the skin so it can sit level again. It targets the mechanism, which is why it beats surface treatment for that type.
Yes, with fractional settings chosen for pigment-prone skin and strict aftercare — post-treatment pigmentation is the known risk, managed by conservative parameters and photoprotection.
Control first, reconstruct second. Active acne keeps creating new scars behind each repair — sequencing protects both the result and the spend.
Side and overhead light casts shadows into depressions — rolling scars especially. That is also the honest way to photograph progress: same light, same angle, every time.
Patient guide (PDF): Acne scar types and options — a printable summary of this page, medically reviewed by Dr Sin Yong. General information, not a substitute for assessment.
Medically reviewed by Dr Sin Yong, MBBS (NUS), MRCS (Edinburgh) · Last updated 7 October 2026 · Editorial policy
A 30-second stretch test that tells you something real about your scar type. A short video from Dr Sin Yong’s Instagram, with captions.
Rolling scars are broad, shallow depressions with soft, sloping edges, caused by fibrous bands that tether the skin to the tissue beneath, so treatment starts by releasing those bands, usually with subcision. They give the cheek an undulating, wave-like surface that shows most in overhead or side light and softens when the skin is stretched, which is the quickest way to tell them from boxcar scars.
Because the skin surface of a rolling scar is close to normal, resurfacing alone treats the wrong layer: the tether keeps pulling the skin down. In subcision, a needle or cannula is passed beneath the scar to cut the bands. Filler or a biostimulator may then be placed to support the released skin and reduce the chance of it re-tethering, and energy-based collagen remodelling such as fractional CO2 or RF microneedling is added later to refine the surface. Some scars need release more than once, and the number of treatments is not fixed in advance. Dr Sin Yong's 4D Scar Reconstruction brings subcision, TCA CROSS, ablative resurfacing and injectable support into one sequenced programme when rolling scars sit alongside other types.
Boxcar scars are wider, round or oval depressions with sharp vertical edges and a flat base, while ice pick scars are narrow, deep, V-shaped pits under about 2 mm across that can look like large open pores. Neither flattens much when the skin is stretched, which separates both from rolling scars.
The difference matters because depth and width decide the tool. Shallow boxcar scars sit within reach of fractional ablative resurfacing, which remodels the edges and floor. Deeper boxcars may need the edges addressed first, with focal TCA CROSS or a punch technique, before resurfacing blends the area. Ice pick scars usually run deeper than resurfacing lasers reach, so they are treated focally: TCA CROSS places a high-strength acid into each pit to stimulate collagen from within, and punch excision removes the tract altogether. Most faces carry both types, often with rolling scars as well, which is why each scar is mapped and counted before any device is chosen.
| Scar type | What it looks like | What lies beneath | Tools usually considered | What does not help |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice pick | Narrow (under 2 mm), deep, pore-like pits | A narrow tract running deep into the dermis | TCA CROSS or punch techniques | Surface resurfacing alone; scar creams |
| Boxcar | Round or oval depressions with sharp edges and a flat base | A block of lost dermis with intact edges | Fractional ablative resurfacing; TCA CROSS or punch techniques for deeper boxcars | Subcision alone, as nothing is tethered |
| Rolling | Broad, wave-like undulations with soft, sloping edges | Fibrous bands tethering the skin to deeper tissue | Subcision, with filler or biostimulator support, then energy-based remodelling | Resurfacing alone; topical products |
| Hypertrophic and keloid | Raised, firm scars; keloids spread beyond the original spot | Excess collagen production | The injection-based keloid pathway, silicone and selected lasers | Resurfacing or subcision planned for depressed scars |
| Flat dark or red marks (PIH, PIE) | Flat discolouration with no dent | Pigment or dilated vessels rather than lost tissue | Pigment or vascular treatment, with sun protection | Scar revision techniques, which treat depth rather than colour |